Как провести интервью во время и после пандемии COVID-19
Научная статья
Для цитирования
Сэлф Б., Рязанцев А. П. (Перев). Как провести интервью во время и после пандемии COVID-19 // Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация. 2021. Том 13. № 4. С. 9-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2021.13.4.1
Аннотация
Проведение интервью по телефону или с использованием VoIP (IP-телефония, телефонная связь по протоколу IP) стало необходимым вследствие правовых ограничений и мер безопасности, введенных в период пандемии COVID-19. Это способствовало началу научного диалога относительно выбора типа интервью, а также признанию, что именно личные интервью (face-to-face interview) являются «золотым стандартом» [Novick, 2008: 397]. Широкая общественность также стала постепенно привыкать к использованию VoIP в своей повседневной жизни. В данной статье я анализирую это изменение в способах коммуникации и то влияние, которое оно может оказать на режимы проведения интервью. При этом контекст исследователя и контекст участника остаются первостепенными при принятии решения о том, какой режим интервью использовать. По этой причине модель Ш. Олтман [Oltmann, 2016] была расширена за счет включения в нее VoIP, предоставляя тем самым исследователю более широкую основу для принятия информированного решения при выборе режима интервью.
Ключевые слова:
режимы интервью, Zoom, VoIP, Skype, телефон, качественное интервью, личное интервью, качественное исследование
Литература
Abraham H.N. et al. Engaging Third-Year Medical Students on Their Internal Medicine Clerkship in Telehealth During COVID-19 // Cureus. 2020. Vol. 12. № 6. Art. e8791. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8791
Addo G. Worshipping on Zoom: A Digital Ethnographic Study of African Pentecostals Churches and Their Liturgical Practices during Covid-19. Malmö: Malmö University, 2020. URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-23360 (дата обращения: 19.02.2021).
Alvesson M. Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research // Academy of Management Review. 2003. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 13—33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925191
Archibald M.M. et al. Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Bailey K.D. Methods of Social Research. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press, 1987.
Bampton R., Cowton C.J. The E-Interview // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3. № 2. Art. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.848
Bayles M. Is Physical Proximity Essential to the Psychoanalytic Process? An Exploration through the Lens of Skype // Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2012. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 569—585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.717043
Bekes V., Aafjes-van Doorn K. Psychotherapists Attitudes toward Online Therapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic // Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 2020. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 238—247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000214
Boman I.-L. et al. Exploring the Usability of a Videophone Mock-up for Persons with Dementia and Their Significant Others // BMC Geriatrics. 2014. Vol. 14. № 1. Art. 49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-49
Brink P.J. Issues in Reliability and Validity // Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue / Ed. by J.M. Morse. Newbury Park: SAGE, 1991. P. 164—186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349015.n20
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Carr E.C., Worth A. The Use of the Telephone Interview for Research // NT Research. 2001. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 511—524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136140960100600107
Cheng F.K. Dilemmas of Chinese Lesbian Youths in Contemporary Mainland China // Sexuality & Culture. 2018. Vol. 22. № 1. P. 190—208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9460-8
Deakin H., Wakefield K. Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers // Qualitative Research. 2014. Vol. 14. № 5. P. 603—616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794113488126
Denzin N.K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1989.
Dias M., Lopes R., Teles A. Will Virtual Replace Classroom Teaching? Lessons from Virtual Classes via Zoom in the Times of COVID-19 // Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy. 2020. P. 208—213. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i05.004
Dinham S. The Use of the Telephone Interview in Educational Research: One Case Study // Education Research and Perspectives. 1993. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 17—26.
Dodds S., Hess A.C.H. Adapting Research Methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for Transformative Service Research // Journal of Service Management. 2020. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 203—217. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
Doody O., Noonan M. Preparing and Conducting Interviews to Collect Data // Nurse Researcher. 2013. Vol. 20. № 5. P. 28—32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327
Gillham B. Research Interviewing: The Range of Techniques. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2005.
Glogowska M., Young P., Lockyer L. Propriety, Process and Purpose: Considerations of the Use of the Telephone Interview Methods in an Educational Research Study // Higher Education. 2011. Vol. 62. № 1. P. 17—26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9362-2
Gray L.M. et al. Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications // The Qualitative Report. 2020. Vol. 25. № 5. P. 1292—1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715%2F2020.4212
Hanna P. Using Internet Technologies (such as Skype) as a Research Medium: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2012. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 239—242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794111426607
Hesse-Biber Sh., Griffin A.J. Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research: Problems and Prospects // Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 43—61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689812451791
Holt A. Using the Telephone for Narrative Interviewing: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2010. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 113—121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794109348686
Hubbard G. et al. Supportive Care Needs of Women with Breast Cancer in Rural Scotland // Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015. Vol. 23. № 6. P. 1523—1532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2501-z
Jourian T.J. Trans*forming College Masculinities: Carving out Trans*masculine Pathways through the Threshold of Dominance // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2017. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 245—265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1257752
Kalekin-Fishman D. Looking at Interviewing: From “Just Talk” to Meticulous Method // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3. № 4. Art. 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.800
Kazmer M.M., Xie B. Qualitative Interviewing in Internet Studies: Playing with the Media, Playing with the Method // Information, Community and Society. 2008. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 257—278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946333
Knox S., Burkard A.W. Qualitative Research Interviews // Psychotherapy Research. 2009. Vol. 19. № 4—5. P. 566—575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702105
Kominers S.D. et al. Zoom Video Communications: Eric Yuans Leadership during COVID-19. Harvard Business School Case 821-014. 2020. URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58693 (дата обращения: 19.02.2021).
Lambert S.D., Loiselle C.G. Combining Individual Interviews and Focus Groups to Enhance Data Richness // Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008. Vol. 62. № 2. P. 228—237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
Lechuga V.M. Exploring Culture from a Distance: The Utility of Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2012. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 251—268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.529853
Lo Iacono V., Symonds P., Brown D.H.K. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews // Sociological Research Online. 2016. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 103—117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153%2Fsro.3952
Lobe B., Morgan D., Hoffman K.A. Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Longhurst R. Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups // Key Methods in Geography / Ed. by N. Clifford et al. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2003. P. 143—156.
Magnusson E., Marecek J. Doing Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Learner's Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107449893
Maitland C.F. Now You See It, Now You Don't: Digital Connectivity in Marginalized Communities // Computer. 2018. Vol. 51. № 6. P. 62—71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.2701624
Novick G. Is There a Bias against Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research? // Research in Nursing and Health. 2008. № 31. P. 391—398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
Oltmann Sh.M. Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2016. Vol. 17. № 2. Art. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2551
Opdenakker R. Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2006. Vol. 7. № 4. Art. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175
Orne M.T. On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications // American Psychologist. 1962. Vol. 17. № 11. P. 776—783. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0043424
Puddister K., Small T.S. Trial by Zoom? The Response to COVID-19 by Canada's Courts // Canadian Journal of Political Science. 2020. Vol. 53. № 2. P. 373—377. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS0008423920000505
Sandelowski M. Reembodying Qualitative Inquiry // Qualitative Health Research. 2002. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 104—115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001008
Seitz S. Pixilated Partnerships, Overcoming Obstacles in Qualitative Interviews via Skype: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2016. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 229—235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794115577011
Shuy R.W. In-Person Versus Telephone Interviewing // Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method / Ed. by J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2002. P. 537—555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n32
Sipes J.B.A., Roberts L.D., Mullan B. Voice-Only Skype for Use in Researching Sensitive Topics: A Research Note // Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1577518
Skinner K. et al. Giving Voice to Food Insecurity in a Remote Indigenous Community in Subarctic Ontario, Canada: Traditional Ways, Way to Cope, Ways Forward // BMC Public Health. 2013. № 13. Art. 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-427
Stephens N. Collecting Data from Elites and Ultra Elites: Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews with Macroeconomists // Qualitative Research. 2007. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 203—216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076020
Sturges J.E., Hanrahan K.J. Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2004. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 107—118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794104041110
Sullivan J.R. Skype: An Appropriate Method of Data Collection for Qualitative Interviews? // The Hilltop Review. 2012. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 54—60.
Sweet L. Telephone Interviewing: Is It Compatible with Interpretive Phenomenological Research? // Contemporary Nurse. 2002. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 58—63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.12.1.58
Sy M. et al. Doing Interprofessional Research in the COVID-19 Era: A Discussion Paper // Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020. Vol. 34. № 5. P. 600—606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1791808
Taylor S.J., Bogdan R., DeVault M. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015.
Vogl S. Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviews: Mode Effect on Semi-Structured Interviews with Children // Sociological Methodology. 2013. Vol. 43. № 1. P. 133—177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012465967
Ward K., Gott M., Hoare K. Participants' Views of Telephone Interviews within a Grounded Theory Study // Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2015. Vol. 71. № 12. P. 2775—2785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12748
Whale K. The Use of Skype and Telephone Interviews in Sensitive Qualitative Research with Young People: Experiences from the ROCCA Continence Study // Qualitative Methods Psychology Bulletin. 2017. Vol. 23. URL: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/the-use-of-skype-and-telephone-interviews-in-sensitive-qualitativ (дата обращения: 23.08.2021).
Williams S., Sheffield D., Knibb R.C. “Everything's from the Inside out with PCOS”: Exploring Women's Experiences of Living with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Comorbidities through Skype Interviews // Health Psychology Open. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915603051
Wilson V. Research Methods: Interviews // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2012. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 96¬—98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B89P5B
Addo G. Worshipping on Zoom: A Digital Ethnographic Study of African Pentecostals Churches and Their Liturgical Practices during Covid-19. Malmö: Malmö University, 2020. URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-23360 (дата обращения: 19.02.2021).
Alvesson M. Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research // Academy of Management Review. 2003. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 13—33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925191
Archibald M.M. et al. Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Bailey K.D. Methods of Social Research. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press, 1987.
Bampton R., Cowton C.J. The E-Interview // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3. № 2. Art. 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.848
Bayles M. Is Physical Proximity Essential to the Psychoanalytic Process? An Exploration through the Lens of Skype // Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2012. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 569—585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2012.717043
Bekes V., Aafjes-van Doorn K. Psychotherapists Attitudes toward Online Therapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic // Journal of Psychotherapy Integration. 2020. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 238—247. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000214
Boman I.-L. et al. Exploring the Usability of a Videophone Mock-up for Persons with Dementia and Their Significant Others // BMC Geriatrics. 2014. Vol. 14. № 1. Art. 49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-49
Brink P.J. Issues in Reliability and Validity // Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue / Ed. by J.M. Morse. Newbury Park: SAGE, 1991. P. 164—186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349015.n20
Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Carr E.C., Worth A. The Use of the Telephone Interview for Research // NT Research. 2001. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 511—524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136140960100600107
Cheng F.K. Dilemmas of Chinese Lesbian Youths in Contemporary Mainland China // Sexuality & Culture. 2018. Vol. 22. № 1. P. 190—208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9460-8
Deakin H., Wakefield K. Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers // Qualitative Research. 2014. Vol. 14. № 5. P. 603—616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794113488126
Denzin N.K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 3rd ed. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1989.
Dias M., Lopes R., Teles A. Will Virtual Replace Classroom Teaching? Lessons from Virtual Classes via Zoom in the Times of COVID-19 // Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy. 2020. P. 208—213. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i05.004
Dinham S. The Use of the Telephone Interview in Educational Research: One Case Study // Education Research and Perspectives. 1993. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 17—26.
Dodds S., Hess A.C.H. Adapting Research Methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for Transformative Service Research // Journal of Service Management. 2020. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 203—217. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
Doody O., Noonan M. Preparing and Conducting Interviews to Collect Data // Nurse Researcher. 2013. Vol. 20. № 5. P. 28—32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.28.e327
Gillham B. Research Interviewing: The Range of Techniques. Berkshire: Open University Press, 2005.
Glogowska M., Young P., Lockyer L. Propriety, Process and Purpose: Considerations of the Use of the Telephone Interview Methods in an Educational Research Study // Higher Education. 2011. Vol. 62. № 1. P. 17—26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9362-2
Gray L.M. et al. Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications // The Qualitative Report. 2020. Vol. 25. № 5. P. 1292—1301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715%2F2020.4212
Hanna P. Using Internet Technologies (such as Skype) as a Research Medium: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2012. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 239—242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794111426607
Hesse-Biber Sh., Griffin A.J. Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research: Problems and Prospects // Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2013. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 43—61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689812451791
Holt A. Using the Telephone for Narrative Interviewing: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2010. Vol. 10. № 1. P. 113—121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794109348686
Hubbard G. et al. Supportive Care Needs of Women with Breast Cancer in Rural Scotland // Supportive Care in Cancer. 2015. Vol. 23. № 6. P. 1523—1532. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2501-z
Jourian T.J. Trans*forming College Masculinities: Carving out Trans*masculine Pathways through the Threshold of Dominance // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2017. Vol. 30. № 3. P. 245—265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1257752
Kalekin-Fishman D. Looking at Interviewing: From “Just Talk” to Meticulous Method // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2002. Vol. 3. № 4. Art. 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.800
Kazmer M.M., Xie B. Qualitative Interviewing in Internet Studies: Playing with the Media, Playing with the Method // Information, Community and Society. 2008. Vol. 11. № 2. P. 257—278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946333
Knox S., Burkard A.W. Qualitative Research Interviews // Psychotherapy Research. 2009. Vol. 19. № 4—5. P. 566—575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300802702105
Kominers S.D. et al. Zoom Video Communications: Eric Yuans Leadership during COVID-19. Harvard Business School Case 821-014. 2020. URL: https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=58693 (дата обращения: 19.02.2021).
Lambert S.D., Loiselle C.G. Combining Individual Interviews and Focus Groups to Enhance Data Richness // Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008. Vol. 62. № 2. P. 228—237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x
Lechuga V.M. Exploring Culture from a Distance: The Utility of Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research // International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2012. Vol. 25. № 3. P. 251—268. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.529853
Lo Iacono V., Symonds P., Brown D.H.K. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews // Sociological Research Online. 2016. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 103—117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153%2Fsro.3952
Lobe B., Morgan D., Hoffman K.A. Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing // International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Longhurst R. Semi-Structured Interviews and Focus Groups // Key Methods in Geography / Ed. by N. Clifford et al. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2003. P. 143—156.
Magnusson E., Marecek J. Doing Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Learner's Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107449893
Maitland C.F. Now You See It, Now You Don't: Digital Connectivity in Marginalized Communities // Computer. 2018. Vol. 51. № 6. P. 62—71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.2701624
Novick G. Is There a Bias against Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research? // Research in Nursing and Health. 2008. № 31. P. 391—398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
Oltmann Sh.M. Qualitative Interviews: A Methodological Discussion of the Interviewer and Respondent Contexts // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2016. Vol. 17. № 2. Art. 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-17.2.2551
Opdenakker R. Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Interview Techniques in Qualitative Research // Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2006. Vol. 7. № 4. Art. 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.4.175
Orne M.T. On the Social Psychology of the Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications // American Psychologist. 1962. Vol. 17. № 11. P. 776—783. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0043424
Puddister K., Small T.S. Trial by Zoom? The Response to COVID-19 by Canada's Courts // Canadian Journal of Political Science. 2020. Vol. 53. № 2. P. 373—377. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017%2FS0008423920000505
Sandelowski M. Reembodying Qualitative Inquiry // Qualitative Health Research. 2002. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 104—115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302012001008
Seitz S. Pixilated Partnerships, Overcoming Obstacles in Qualitative Interviews via Skype: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2016. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 229—235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794115577011
Shuy R.W. In-Person Versus Telephone Interviewing // Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method / Ed. by J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2002. P. 537—555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412973588.n32
Sipes J.B.A., Roberts L.D., Mullan B. Voice-Only Skype for Use in Researching Sensitive Topics: A Research Note // Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1577518
Skinner K. et al. Giving Voice to Food Insecurity in a Remote Indigenous Community in Subarctic Ontario, Canada: Traditional Ways, Way to Cope, Ways Forward // BMC Public Health. 2013. № 13. Art. 427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-427
Stephens N. Collecting Data from Elites and Ultra Elites: Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews with Macroeconomists // Qualitative Research. 2007. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 203—216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107076020
Sturges J.E., Hanrahan K.J. Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: A Research Note // Qualitative Research. 2004. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 107—118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794104041110
Sullivan J.R. Skype: An Appropriate Method of Data Collection for Qualitative Interviews? // The Hilltop Review. 2012. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 54—60.
Sweet L. Telephone Interviewing: Is It Compatible with Interpretive Phenomenological Research? // Contemporary Nurse. 2002. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 58—63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.12.1.58
Sy M. et al. Doing Interprofessional Research in the COVID-19 Era: A Discussion Paper // Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2020. Vol. 34. № 5. P. 600—606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1791808
Taylor S.J., Bogdan R., DeVault M. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015.
Vogl S. Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviews: Mode Effect on Semi-Structured Interviews with Children // Sociological Methodology. 2013. Vol. 43. № 1. P. 133—177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012465967
Ward K., Gott M., Hoare K. Participants' Views of Telephone Interviews within a Grounded Theory Study // Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2015. Vol. 71. № 12. P. 2775—2785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12748
Whale K. The Use of Skype and Telephone Interviews in Sensitive Qualitative Research with Young People: Experiences from the ROCCA Continence Study // Qualitative Methods Psychology Bulletin. 2017. Vol. 23. URL: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/the-use-of-skype-and-telephone-interviews-in-sensitive-qualitativ (дата обращения: 23.08.2021).
Williams S., Sheffield D., Knibb R.C. “Everything's from the Inside out with PCOS”: Exploring Women's Experiences of Living with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Comorbidities through Skype Interviews // Health Psychology Open. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915603051
Wilson V. Research Methods: Interviews // Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2012. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 96¬—98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B89P5B
Статья
Поступила: 25.09.2021
Опубликована: 26.12.2021
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
APA
Сэлф, Б., & Рязанцев, А. П. (2021). Как провести интервью во время и после пандемии COVID-19. Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация, 13(4), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2021.13.4.1
Раздел
Исследовательская рефлексия
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
