Biographical dimension of terminal illness or is there an alternative to medicine?

  • Sergey Vyacheslavovich Startsev HSE University sstartsev@hse.ru
How to Cite
Startsev S.V. Biographical dimension of terminal illness or is there an alternative to medicine?. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 20. P. 97-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2019.20.5 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article analyzes the biographical case of cancer with problematized attitude to traditional medicine. The author examines the biographical choices of the informant and the problem of not following the medicalist treatment strategy. Optics using analytic methods and social theory, the author seeks to show that living biographer’s disease and agree with the diagnosis of a life inextricably linked with the social relations within which these terms aventureuse, namely in the framework of relations “doctor-patient”. The analysis of this social dyad using the methods of anthropology and narratology brings us closer to the understanding of disease as a phenomenon mediated by the cultural codes of society, the dominant model of which is the biomedical paradigm of studying the “diseased body”.
Keywords:
biographical interview, clinical reality, medical anthropology, mnemonic rituals, doctor-patient relationship

Author Biography

Sergey Vyacheslavovich Startsev, HSE University
Master student of the Faculty of Social Sciences, HSE University

References

Akrich M. (2010) From Communities of Practice to Epistemic Communities: Health Mobilizations on the Internet. Sociological Research Online. Vol. 15. No. 2. URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/2/10.html (accessed: 05 Nov 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2152.



Berkanovic E. (1972) Lay Conceptions of the Sick Role. Social Forces. No. 51. P 53—63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2576131.



Bucchi M. (2019) Facing the Challenges of Science Communication 2.0: Quality, Credibility and Expertise. EFSA Journal. 2019. No. 17 (7). URL: (https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170702) (accessed: 05 Nov 2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170702.



Buller A. (2017) Tri lekcii o ponyatii sled [Three lectures on the concept of trace]. M.: Aletheia.(In Russ.)



Castro E. (2017) Kanibalskie metafisiki. Rubezhi posttrukturnoi antropologii [Cannibal Metaphysics]. M.: Ad Marginem Press. (In Russ.)



Freidson E. (1970) Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. NY: Dodd, Mead & Co.



Garro L. (1994) Narrative Representations of Chronic Illness Experience: Cultural Models of Illness, Mind, and Body in Stories Concerning the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ). Social Science & Medicine. Vol. 38. No. 6. P. 775—788. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)90150-3.



Geertz C. From the Native's Point of View: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding // Rabinow P., Sullivan W. M. (eds.) Interpretative Social Science: a Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979. P 225-42.



Gordon G. (1966) Role Theory and Illness. New Haven, Conn.; College and University Press.



Haraway D. (1985) Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review. Vol. 80. P. 65-108.



Kleinman A. (1988) The Illness Narratives. Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. NY: Basic Books.



Kosa J., Antonovsky A., Zola I.K. (eds) (1969) Poverty and Health. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.



Lehcier V. (2016) Practiki nadezhdy v americanskoi onkologii: po motivam empiricheskih medico-antropologicheskih issledovaniy [Practices of hope in American oncology: based on empirical medical and anthropological research]. Sociologiya vlasti [Sociology of power]]. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 170—184. (In Russ.)



Mall А. (2017) Voploshennoe deistvie, osyshestvlennyie tela: primer gippoglekimii [The embodied action, implemented bodies: an example of hypoglycemia]. Logos. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 233—262. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/0869-5377-2017-1-233-259.



McKinlay J. (1972 (1967) The Sick Role-Illness and Pregnancy. Social Science and Medicine. No. 6. P. 561—572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-7856(72)90072-8.



Parsons T. (1951) The Social System. NY: Free Press.



Pietroni P.C. (1992) Alternative Medicine: Methinks the Doctors Protest Too Much and Incidentally Befuddles the Debate. Journal of medical ethics. No. 18. P. 23—25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.18.1.23.



Rozhdestvenskaya E. (2012) Biograficheskiy metod v sociologii [Biographical method in sociology]. M.: HSE Publishing House. (In Russ.)



Schon D.A. (1984) The Crisis of Professional Knowledge and the Pursuit of an Epistemology of Practice. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.



Schutz A. (1962).Collected Papers. The Problem of Social Reality.Vol. 1. Published by The Hague, Nijhoff, 1962.



Schuetze F. (1983) Biographieforschung und narrative Interview. Neue Praxis. No. 3. P. 283—293.



Sorokin P., Merton R. (2004) Social’noe vremia: opit metodologicheskogo I funkcionalnogo analiza [Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 6. P. 112—119. (In Russ.)



Twaddle A. (1969) Health Decisions and Sick Role Varietions. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. No. 10. P. 105—115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2948358.



Young J.C., Garro L.C. (1994) Medical Choice in a Mexican Village. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.



Zdraivomislova E., Temkina A. (2011) Doveritel’noe sotrudnichestvo vo vzaimodeystvie vracha i pacienta: vzglyad akushera-ginekola [Trustful cooperation in interaction of the doctor and the patient: the view of the obstetrician-gynecologist]. In: E. Zdraivomislova, A. Temkina (eds) Zdorovie i intimnaya zhizn’: sociologichskie podhody [Health and intimate life sociological approaches]. SPb.: EUSPb. P. 23—52. (In Russ.)
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Startsev, S. V. (2019). Biographical dimension of terminal illness or is there an alternative to medicine?. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 11(20), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2019.20.5
Section
Field work research