Conceptualizing Everyday Life

  • Valery B. Golofast Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sociological Institute RAS (St. Petersburg) golofast@mail.ru
How to Cite
Golofast V.B. Conceptualizing Everyday Life. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 67-74. (in Russ.).

Abstract

Biographies of ordinary people are certainly immersed in the sea of everyday life. In one of his early works I have sought to draw attention to the fact that the description of the daily routine in a more or less chronological order is one of the Central layers of any biographical narrative (golofast, 1997). Despite the generality of this retelling, the presence of elements of the genre and of the plot, the routine of everyday life dominates the text. And even when it comes to social events (and there are surprisingly few), still we are talking about the routine, only this time at the macro level - the routine social processes. If the researcher is interested in social change, in vain to look for traces of it in direct estimates and descriptions of the authors of the narratives. Most likely it will be the formulas and stereotypes of popular political or media discourse. In autobiographies dominates the life cycle, path, road, and other metaphors of individual life. This is true even when life is presented as an adventure, as the ascent to success or life failure (Dmitriev and Sokolov, 2000). The researcher must have a certain amount of conceptual schemes, more or less integrated system of views on everyday life and its changes, produced, perhaps, regardless of the practice of reading biographies, to learn to read and problematito intensify the biographical narrative.Without claiming to solve this problem in a modest version of these notes, I intend to draw attention to the bottomlessness of this thematic area.
Keywords:
biographical interview, autobiography, biography,

Author Biography

Valery B. Golofast, Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Sociological Institute RAS (St. Petersburg)
Candidate of philosophical Sciences, head of sector of socio-cultural changes, Institute of sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg)Research interests: methodology of social structure, socio-cultural change, biography

References

Вальденфельс Б. 1991. Повседневность как плавильный тигль рациональности. - Социологос, Вып.1. Ред. В.В.Винокуров и А.Ф.Филиппов. М.: Прогресс.



Витухновская М. 2000. (Ред.) На корме времени. Интервью с ленинградцами 1930-х годов. СПб.: Нева.



Голофаст В. 1997. Три слоя биографического повествования. - В: Воронков В., Здравомыслова Е. (ред.). Биографический метод в изучении постсо-циалистических обществ. СПб.: ЦНСИ. С.23-26; 140-143.



Дмитриева М., Соколов В. 1999. (Ред.). Расскажи свою историю. СПб.: «На дне».



Забарко Б. 1999. (Ред.) Живыми остались только мы. Свидетельства и документы. Киев: Библиотека института иудаики.



Козлова Н. 1992. Социология повседневности: переоценка ценностей. - Общественные науки и современность. №3. С.47-56.



Травин И. 2001. (Отв.ред.) Новые потребности и новые риски: реальность 90-х годов. СПб.: Норма.



Травин И., Симпура Ю. 1999. (Ред.) Повседневность середины 90-х годов глазами петербуржцев. СПб.: Европейский дом.



Цветаева Н. 2000. Биографические нарративы советской эпохи. - Социологический журнал. №1/2. С.150-163.



Waldenfels B. 1985. In den Netzen Lebenswelt. Frankfurt/M.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Golofast, V. B. (2002). Conceptualizing Everyday Life. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, 1(1), 67-74. Retrieved from https://inter-fnisc.ru/index.php/inter/article/view/4433
Section
Research Reflection